First of all please note that the employers gets two emplyees for the virtually the price of one: except for the cost of each employees individual benefits cost. All labor cost per hour remains the same because as each employee only gets paid for the 12 hours worked by each on each day.

Here is how the work shift would look for each employee. Employee #1 and employee #2 would work on an alternating days on and off on a month to month basis. Each emplyoee would would work 168 hours per month and be paid on a bi~monthly basis where each employee would be paid for 44 hours labor every 2 weeks. Each employee will never work more than three 12 hours days in a row without getting the following two days off. If fact each employee would get 3 days off every other weekend. Each emplyee only has to work 15. 12 hour days each month or six months of 12 hour days per year.

The following is a graphic example of a monthly work schedule for each emplyee where when employee #1 is working employee #2 is off: and vise versa.

M T W T F S S
1 1 2 2 1 1 1
2 2 1 1 2 2 2
1 1 2 2 1 1 1
2 2 1 1 2 2 2

Each employee gets a three days weekend everyother weekend is more productive and happy for saving money on expenses that are required by each employee just getting themselves to work 5 less ays per month. This is a win win for the employer, employees and the economy. I personally worked this kind of shift rotation at EDS Corp in 1974: I was able to impliment his 12 hour shift rotation in two other data center environments that had been on a 3. 8 hour shift rotation in a 24 hour 7 day per week environment.

First of all please note that the employers gets two emplyees for the virtually the price of one: except for the cost of each employees individual benefits cost. All labor cost per hour remains the same because as each employee only gets paid for the 12 hours worked by each on each day.

Here is how the work shift would look for each employee. Employee #1 and employee #2 would work on an alternating